Liberalists oppose the use of military power, which they claim is an outdated realist thought.ĭetails Title Theoretical basis for global politics between realism and liberalism College Monash University MelbourneĬourse International Relations Grade B+ Author D. Contrastingly, liberalism advocates for international cooperation in the interest of collective benefits. As such, non-state actors are viewed as antagonistic to the wellbeing of the nation and should be given a wide berth. To realists, the world is a harsh place and application of moral standards limits leaders to do what is logically in the interest of the nation. Basically, realist thought in global politics emphasizes the view that nation-states should pursue unitary political objectives such as power and influence to protect national interest. International relations or global politics is characterized by different schools of thought, including realism and liberalism. It is argued that realism is a more practical representation of the world politics than liberalism as evidenced by global power struggles, wars, isolationism, and ineffective international organizations. This essay evaluates the two schools of thought to determine which one best explains the state of global politics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |